Sunday, July 31, 2016

Mount Vernon Batteau Project/ Guest Blog Post

Building the Batteau: George Washington’s Mount Vernon Fisheries

By Luke J. Pecoraro, PhD

Director of Archaeology, George Washington’s Mount Vernon

   Upon George Washington’s inheritance of Mount Vernon in the mid-eighteenth century, his 2,500 acre holding was characterized by a contemporary source as a “neglected and mediocre plantation” (Walsh, 2001: 54). At pains to keep his estate solvent and also return a profit, Washington made the bold leap from tobacco monoculture to wheat, experimenting with at least 60 different crops in addition to fishing the Potomac River. Of all Washington’s economic pursuits perhaps none were as consistently lucrative as his fisheries; it is estimated that in a spring fishing season that Washington’s operations netted 1.3 million shad and herring, often accounting for more income than any one single crop (Walsh 2001: 52).  
   Both shad and herring were significant food fish in the 18 th century, and at Mount Vernon served both the internal plantation community as well as the broader Atlantic World (Fig. 1). The fishing operations on the Potomac River generally ran from March through May, and during this period enslaved laborers worked from dawn to dusk in small watercraft with seine nets to haul the fish to shore. At the appointed landing sites, the fish would be sorted by species, cleaned, and either salted and barreled for sale to plantations in the West Indies or smoked and sun-dried for consumption by the slaves on Washington’s farms (Atkins 1994: 66). Washington stipulated that each adult slave receive 20 herring per month; during the Revolutionary War when salt was particularly scarce, Washington’s farm manager informed him:

“…I have but very little salt, of which we must make the most. I mean to make a brine and after cutting off the head and bellys dipping them in the brine for but a short time, then hang them up and cure them by smoke, or dry them in the sun; for our people being so long accustomed to have fish whenever they wanted, would think it very hard to have none at all…” (Thompson 1999-2002: 19)

   Archaeological evidence from Mount Vernon’s House for Families, a slave quarter near the Mansion House, yielded hundreds of fish bones and the quantities of shad and herring remains found certainly back up the documentary evidence. What is more, deposits from the House for Families dating from 1780-1790 indicates that herring was a critical element to slave diet, perhaps suggesting that Washington intensified his fishing operations during this period (Bowen et al. 2016: 117).(Fig. 2) Despite what is known of the fisheries at Mount Vernon, little documentary evidence survives relating to the boats used for this lucrative enterprise. Watercraft described in Washington’s writings name vessel types such as a schooner, yawl, brigantine, barge, batteau, and simply “fishing boats”. At least one schooner is thought to have been built by Washington’s carpenters at Mount Vernon, but the small craft used for fishing seem to have been rented during the spring from neighboring planters (Walsh 2001: 52).
   Mount Vernon had a blacksmith shop and a carpenter shop which helped to make the plantation reasonably self-sufficient, and it is likely that Washington’s hired white artisans and enslaved blacksmiths and carpenters built or maintained watercraft for the fisheries (Fig. 3). In an effort to interpret George Washington’s fisheries, the historic trades team along with skilled volunteers from the Alexandria, VA boat-building community is completing the construction of a 21-foot batteau. The batteau is being built on-site at Mount Vernon’s Pioneer Farm location, using traditional methods and reproduction 18 th century tools (Figs. 4, 5). 
   The plan of the batteau comes from the collection of plans compiled by Howard I. Chapelle who served as the curator of maritime history at the Smithsonian Institution from 1957 to 1967. Chapelle’s drawing of the batteau underway at Mount Vernon comes from his work American Small Sailing Craft (1936), a formative text that detailed construction of classic American workboats (Fig. 6). Visitors to Mount Vernon will have the opportunity this summer to visit the craftsmen as they complete the batteau, in addition to watching the up-to- the-minute process online by visiting mountvernon.org/boatcam. To learn more about the archaeology program at Mount Vernon and the material recovered, please visit us at mountvernon.org/preservation/archaeology/.

References

Atkins, Stephen C. 1994 An Archaeological Perspective on the African-American Slave Diet at Mount Vernon’s House forFamilies. MA Thesis, Dept. of Anthropology, College of William and Mary. Williamsburg, VA.

Bowen, Joanne, et al. 2016 Faunal Analysis for Mount Vernon: South Grove Assemblages (44FX762/17), House for Families  Assemblages (44FX762/40 and 44FX762/47). Manuscript prepared for Mount Vernon’s Archaeology Program, Dept. of Historic Preservation and Collections. Colonial Williamsburg Dept. of Archaeological Research. Williamsburg, VA.

Thompson, Mary V. 1999-2002 “’Better…fed than Negroes Generally Are?’: Diet of Mount Vernon Slaves.” Manuscript on file, Mount Vernon Ladies Association. Mount Vernon, VA.

Walsh, Lorena S. 2001 “Slavery and Agriculture at Mount Vernon,” in Philip J. Schwarz, editor, Slavery at the Home of George Washington. Mount Vernon Ladies Association: Mount Vernon, VA. pp. 47-77.


Figure 1: Approximate locations of George Washington’s fisheries.


Figure 2: fish bones and scales recovered from the House for Families excavation.


Figure 3: (l) 18th c. compass or dividers in use by the batteau builders, alongside (r) an example recovered archaeologically at Mount Vernon.

 

Figure 4: Batteau under construction.


Figure 5: Replica tools for boat building.


Figure 6: Chapelle’s 1936 batteau plan.  

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Virginia Maritime Heritage Update/ CSS RICHMOND


Virginia Maritime Heritage Update/ CSS RICHMOND

Over the past three years Michael Nusbaum and his colleagues have been working with Department of Historic Resources, Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, associates of VCU, as well as NOAA to document the remains of the Confederate warship CSS Richmond and associated sites.  This blog post is to clarify to my international colleagues this project, which has been somewhat closed to the media and the general archaeological community.  The project is well planned and Michael Nusbaum (a passionate avocational)  has gone to a great length to construct a valid research objective in recording these sites, their current state of preservation, and help Department of Historic Resources develop a management plan.  Department of Historic Resources state conservator Katherine Ridgway has taken into her possession new and used equipment from the Mariners’ Museum in Newport News to aid in the conservation of any recovered material.  While the release of information and data has been small we all await the publication of the site drawings, photographs of conserved recovered materials, and final field recording publication.  All maritime archaeologists in Virginia hope that this project will usher in a revival, one which has been much awaited since 1989, of Virginia’s establishment of sustainable long term infrastructure to replace the sporadic and disparate recording standards of the past 25 years in regard to our shared submerged cultural heritage.    We hope that this will inspire not only those scholars imbued with a fascination with the lost cause of the greycoats, but those who love any and all forms of maritime culture in Virginia. 

For more official information you can direct your questions to Dr. Mike Barber, State Archaeologist of Virginia.   Mike.Barber@dhr.virginia.gov

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

500th anniversary of Waldseemüller's 1516 Carta Marina.

October 6-7 (Washington, DC, USA)
The Library of Congress in Washington, DC will hold a two-day lecture series and celebration of Waldseemüller's 1516 Carta Marina.  Originally published in 1516, this event will celebrate the 500th anniversary of the Carta Marina with lectures on "Washington Facts or Fictions: Debating the Mysteries of Early Modern Science and Cartography."  For more information, contact John Hessler, Geography and Map Division, Library of Congress, at jhes(at)loc.go
 
 

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Monthly publication highlight: A Study of a 16th -century wooden vessel from the Netherlands by Margaret Logan


Summary

The sixteenth century, specifically concerning shipbuilding, presents a gap in the available information. As Jacques van Damme of the Scheepsvaartmuseum Baasrode put it, "It's a hole" (Van Damme, 2013, personal communication). The period is sandwiched between the Middle Ages and the dawn of the  Dutch Golden Age, two periods with relative wealths of information, data, and material. For this reason, the discovery of a vessel dated to this particular period provides a small glimpse into  the usually-dim era of shipbuilders and shipbuilding.

OE34, a wooden flush-plank vessel roughly 16m long and 5m wide, and dated (both dendrochronologically and relatively) to the second half of the sixteenth century, was discovered in 1979 in a reclamated polder in Flevoland, the Netherlands. The vessel featured ceiling planking, anextensive framing system, and hull planking, as well as an assortment of associated finds. Theseincluded a few weapons, barrels of quicklime, coins, ceramic pitchers, and more. Over the course of two sessions in 2011 and 2012, under the direction of the International Fieldschool of Maritime Archaeology Flevoland, the vessel was excavated and deposed. The author herself participated in thesecond session of excavation. Sources will therefore be the excavation drawings and photographs, as well as comparisons to other vessels which are either contemporaneous with OE34 or feature similar constructional characteristics.

It is the aim of this thesis to present the vessel in it's entirety, both in constructional elementsand associated finds. Perhaps, in the course of such scrutiny, it is possible to discern what the vesselmay have been used for, and maybe even some conclusive statements can be made about the shipbuilders who constructed it. It will not be a question of which typology of water-craft to place the vessel. The author goes so far as to argue that such endeavours in and of themselves do little in the way of academic research, and in the attempt to shed light on the past. To, dare I say, simply categorize a vessel based on construction method is moot. Rather, what can the comprehensive analysis of a vessel tell us, if anything, about its possible function, and about those who built and sailed it? "[Ships'] remains, like the words of historical texts, carry meaning of far more interpretive value than simple identification like labels in an old-fashioned museum case. A far better strategy is an approach that seeks to capitalize on the source materials in a more integrated way" (Adams, 2003, p 42). This holistic approach will take into account three aspects of the vessel. First, the historical setting in which the vessel was built and operated—namely the Netherlands in the period leading to the Dutch Golden Age. Second, and more strongly, the construction of the vessel; careful and methodical observation of every element of the vessel can reveal what methods and materials were used when building it, as well as the constructional philosophy behind it.  Third and lastly, to a lesser degree, the myriad associated finds will be considered, and the information which can be gleaned from them. For example, coins found in the course of excavation revealed the foundering date of the vessel, based on the lack of a particular mark or stamp on those coins.

One may almost call this approach an anthropological one: the human aspect should always be the final destination of a research question. Quantitative data concerning the archaeological record is crucial and infinitely useful, when used as a magnifying glass, microscope, or telescope to those who created, used, and/or discarded or lost the artefact in question. With this small wooden vessel from the Low Countries, approached with a holistic (almost anthropological) view, the author hopes to come to conclusive statements concerning who built and used her.


http://www.maritimearchaeology.dk/downloads/Logan%202013.pdf